tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2105799931107229707.post3945388585757222294..comments2024-03-07T03:09:25.987-06:00Comments on Unlikely Otaku: For Jeff: Special relativity?Stephanie Barrhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17772217449161603561noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2105799931107229707.post-34081430480343930792009-08-19T15:52:30.575-05:002009-08-19T15:52:30.575-05:00great blog keep up the good workgreat blog keep up the good workvision2eyes@gmail.comhttp://eyeglass4u.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2105799931107229707.post-5875761972463567212009-08-06T12:09:11.552-05:002009-08-06T12:09:11.552-05:00See, Jeff? Now you know who to ask next time.See, Jeff? Now you know who to ask next time.Stephanie Barrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17772217449161603561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2105799931107229707.post-33674641336752044732009-08-06T10:13:46.230-05:002009-08-06T10:13:46.230-05:00Teoría Conectada: The best physics theory since 16...Teoría Conectada: The best physics theory since 1687<br /><br /> The new Copernican revolution<br /><br /> I read Lee Smolin's book ‘Las dudas de la física en el siglo XXI’, 2007, Ed. Crítica. Wonderful. I have seen that Lee Smolin are looking for a new big idea, the fundamental simply idea for the progress and unification of physics. Seems that Smolin got the conviction that both quantum mechanics and GR theorys don’t understand the deep nature of time (page 355). It is right for GR unless.<br /><br /> Here is what i say:<br /> No more Lorentz’s Transformations. The new alternatives transformations (’relational transformations’) are deduced on ‘LA PARADOJA DE LOS GEMELOS DE LA TEORÍA DE LA RELATIVIDAD ESPECIAL DE EINSTEIN’, f.i., equations (22) and (23) with “C” and “D” given by (42) and (43) , pages (33) to (36). From them arises the ‘teoría relacional’, an alternative to special relativity.<br /> The generalitation of this ‘teoría relacional’, the unique possible classic alternative to GR, appears on ‘EXTRACTO DE LA TEORÍA CONECTADA'. 3 are the fundamental equations. (84), (171) and (172), pages (146) and (182). This 3=24 equations are necessary in order to eliminate the Newton-Einstein’s absolute space. There are not absolutes accelerations (neither absolutes velocities, of course).<br /><br /> The Dark Matter problem is solved in ‘Apéncice C’, page 205 (Exponential factor gets important at large distance from the center).<br /><br /> What about a “quantum teoría conectada”? I believe that you can say something important about it.<br /><br /> Xavier Terri<br /> Terrassa 2009 august 6<br /><br /><br /><br />P.D.: Smolin is completely certain when he tell that the great historic mistake comes from Descartes-Galileo ('Las dudas de la física en el s.XXI', pages 355-356). This great historic error is the Principle of Inertia (movement is a relational concept. It is completely false that the movement of ALL free bodies is a straight line. Some of them move, respect the SAME reference system, in a curved way. Spacetime metric defines a specific relationship betwen bodies and reference system.Pure evidence beyond the reason: at night, see the stars). Also, Principle of Inertia leads us to the inertial-non inertial dichotomy. Where is INVARIANCE of physical laws? (pages 45 on 'Paradoja' and 141, eq. (77), on 'Teoría Conectada').Xavier Terrihttp://vixra.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2105799931107229707.post-40260956126491488512009-08-05T17:33:21.962-05:002009-08-05T17:33:21.962-05:00thx for the time for looking into it... i watch a ...thx for the time for looking into it... i watch a film on it and made my mind hurt thinking about it. i will just say they think this is true and like you said 200 years from now it might be completly dif from now. thx againJeff Kinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00667419764890599092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2105799931107229707.post-81690364409394055242009-08-05T11:05:52.790-05:002009-08-05T11:05:52.790-05:00There's a reason I don't bill myself as a ...There's a reason I don't bill myself as a theoretical physics. If this is a topic that intrigues you (me, not so much), I urge you to take advantage of the other resources my commenters have provided. They always come through when I'm not complete.Stephanie Barrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17772217449161603561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2105799931107229707.post-13755345771444491952009-08-05T11:01:09.608-05:002009-08-05T11:01:09.608-05:00For another more sensible take on how reality work...For another more sensible take on how reality works check out this site. Super Relativity.org<br />The Theory of Super Relativity: <a href="http://www.superrelativity.org/" title="Super Relativity" rel="nofollow">Super Relativity</a>mmfiorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07649185144011409332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2105799931107229707.post-86562483469835536342009-08-05T07:18:44.698-05:002009-08-05T07:18:44.698-05:00I highly recommend Brian Green's book, The Ele...I highly recommend Brian Green's book, The Elegant Universe. His insightful analogies really make this esoteric stuff (mostly) understandable.The Motherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15157821003454766570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2105799931107229707.post-25184108632446401932009-08-04T22:08:20.030-05:002009-08-04T22:08:20.030-05:00something in here reminded me of neutrinos again -...something in here reminded me of neutrinos again - must be the "particles we haven't discerned yet"flithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06287047761151044124noreply@blogger.com